New Media Literacies
 

Contact Us!

 
 

Visit the PLAY! Wiki

 
   
 

 
 
www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos and videos from New Media Literacies. Make your own badge here.
 
 

PLAY! and Other Acronyms

|
Our team has just finished wrapping-up our PLAY! (participatory learning and you) professional development pilot with LAUSD educators and is about to embark on making sense of the rich data we have acquired these past few months. At first glance, what teachers seem to be embracing most strongly from this experience are the practices of participation - or the 4 Cs (connecting, collaborating, creating and circulating). It seems that not only students, as we discovered in our after-school pilot last spring, but teachers find them the most accessible entry-point to the new media literacies.

At the onset of the pilot, we framed the PD as an exploration of the 5 characteristics of participatory learning that NML had begun to identify last year. This approach - to explore what the culture of the classroom requires in order to allow participatory practices in - was a divergence from the ways we had previously worked with teachers in schools. In prior collaborations we helped address learning goals for students by applying the new media literacies to traditional content, hence increasing and deepening levels of student engagement with it. An example was the Moby Dick project. The complex and often intimidating novel, was dynamically transformed into a musical performance where students remixed relevant themes and cultural references with an old text. This produced a teachers' strategy guide called Reading in a Participatory Culture (and is a forthcoming book!). We hoped other teachers would use this model and adapt it suitably for their own classrooms. But without support and collaboration, this was an undertaking most teachers argued they did not have adequate time to explore. 

A year or so later, we moved into developing our first professional development pilot program with the state of New Hampshire. Here we approached the new media literacies across subject areas and grade levels with several teachers at once. While teachers regarded these skills as important 21st century literacies, we found some did not value particular skills such as collective intelligence or multitasking. While we certainly do not advocate that each new media literacy holds equal weight across content areas, we recognized early on that we had skipped an important step in our attempt to help teachers implement the nmls by neglecting to explain what we mean by "participatory culture" first. 



While changing course to reverse this oversight, we also recognized a resistance from teachers to become "co-learners" with their students - a necessary component of participatory classrooms. Since from the start they had mentally embraced the nml play (the capacity to experiment with one's surroundings as a form of problem solving)we refocussed our time on exploring what kind of "letting go" this required on their part. This challenge - to risk the classroom becoming a place where students and teachers alike could to play and fail, was the portal that not only led to allowing students the opportunity to engage with media in new ways, but to reshape what learning means in an environment where failure was part of the norm and participation is open to all levels. Through these teachers' willingness, we were able to identify five characteristics that summed up what a truly participatory learning environment requires: heightened motivation and new forms of engagement through meaningful play and experimentation; an integrated learning system where connections between home, school community and world are enabled and encouraged; co-learning where educators and students pool their skills and knowledge and share in the tasks of teaching and learning; learning that feel relevant to the students' identities and interests; and opportunities for creating and solving problems using a variety of media, tools and practices.

It was from this perspective we launched our PLAY! pilot PD this past summer. We set out to create a truly participatory professional development experience where the 5 characteristics were modeled in our design - and if my observations are reliable, it seems we were on the right track. Although I don't necessarily notice teachers referencing the actual characteristics by name, they have certainly implied them through implementation.

At the beginning of the PD last August, Henry Jenkins gave an introduction to participatory culture and introduced the "6 Ps of Play". I love these 6Ps as much as the 4Cs, 12NMLs and 5CPLs, and apparently the teachers do too. Next to the Cs they are the most referenced set of traits our teachers talk about when reflecting on shifts they have experienced this school year. They are not mentioning them by name, but through ownership and practice. As we continue to simplify our many acronyms and refine our framework while adding new consonant sets to the arsenal, it is no wonder specific vocabulary gets lost in the shuffle, but the important thing is that the practices of participation are at play!

In light of all this, I thought this a good time to revisit by a blog post from Henry Jenkins' official weblog Confessions of an Aca-Fan, called Shall We Play?  where he talks about the core values of play and explains the 6Ps in detail.

What are your acronyms?!

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus